300 Challenger 2.0T vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Price Comparison
KWD 11735
KWD 8458
KWD 11271
KWD 8086
KWD 158
KWD 114
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.5
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.55
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4709 mm
1930 mm
1897 mm
1927 mm
1745 mm
2750 mm
2705 mm
400 L
331 L
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
75 L
55 L
10 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
181 BHP
387 Nm
245 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
