Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Hiace Van STD DSL AT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
KWD 12843
KWD 11428
KWD 12312
KWD 10939
KWD 173
KWD 154
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.48
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.48
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.36
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.36
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 14.4
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 14.4
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 175.2
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 175.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
3
3
2360
2215
16
16
5915
5265
1950
1950
2280
1990
3860
3210
3500
3300
6.4m
5.5m
3180 - 1760 - 1605
2530 - 1760 - 1340
9.3m³
6.2m³
1140
1085
Fuel Economy
12.6 Km/L
13.0 Km/L
70
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
4.2
4.2
✓
✓
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
2
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson Strut
Macpherson Strut
Leaf spring rigid
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Drum
Drum
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.8
2.8
Diesel
Diesel
174
174
450
450
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
