Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
KWD 10029
KWD 10029
KWD 9642
KWD 9642
KWD 135
KWD 135
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
6
/
Dimensions
3
/
2155
/
16
/
5265
/
1950
/
1990
/
3210
/
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
/
277
/
351
/
Technologies
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
