HILUX 2025 2.7L DC 4X4 AT GL Commercial vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent loading capacity
- Suitable fuel efficiency
- High durability for long use
Negative
- Driving comfort needs to be improved
- Simple interior design
- Limited technical equipment
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 10103
KWD 10400
KWD 9715
KWD 9999
KWD 136
KWD 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.54
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.78
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.2
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 197.1
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
175
/
5
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
17
/
4
/
5325
5.362
1855
1.976
1815
1.816
3085
3.221
/
1180
Fuel Economy
/
11.1
80
80
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Double Wish Bone
/
Leaf Spring Rigid Axle
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
235/70R17C
/
235/70R17C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
3.2 L
Gasoline
Diesel
164 BHP
200 BHP
/
470
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
