Master L2H2 vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
KWD 7876
KWD 10029
KWD 7577
KWD 9642
KWD 106
KWD 135
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
Dimensions
3
3
1934 kg
2155
16
16
5548
5265
2499
1990
3682
3210
3.5T
3200
174 mm
/
10.8m³
6.2m³
/
1950
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
1045
Fuel Economy
100
70
/
9.1 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
2
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
3.5
Diesel
Gasoline
125
277
/
351
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
