Ciaz 1.5L GL vs Hongqi H9 2024 2.0T Luxury Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 4532
KWD 20800
KWD 4360
KWD 19999
KWD 61
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 10.23
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
250
4
4
1462 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4490 mm
5137
1730 mm
1904
1475 mm
1493
2650 mm
3060
480 L
/
160 m
/
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
14.1
43 L
62
16.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
6
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard LCD
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED with Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
103 BHP
252 BHP
138 Nm
380
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
