EC6 Standard Range vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 21684
KWD 20803
KWD 20816
KWD 20015
KWD 292
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
2292
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
4849
5115 mm
1995
1980 mm
1697
1920 mm
2888 mm
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
Fabric
✓
Digital
✓
Electric
✓
/
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.8"
9
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
23
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
4.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
490 BHP
271 BHP
550 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
150
/
Technologies
9
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
