Land Cruiser Hybrid VXR vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Price Comparison
KWD 33804
KWD 37223
KWD 32517
KWD 35812
KWD 455
KWD 501
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 15.35
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
3498
/
GCC
/
/
250 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5005
4922 mm
1980
2004 mm
1940
1745 mm
/
2975 mm
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
10.9
9.5 Km/L
98
83 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front, Rear And Third Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
11
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
/
JBL
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
4.4 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
457 BHP
530 BHP
790
750 Nm
24 V, DUAL VVT-I, V35A-FTS
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
