Camry 3.5L 40th Anniversary (298 HP) vs Dodge Charger 2023 5.7L R/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
KWD 11727
KWD 15599
KWD 11231
KWD 14995
KWD 158
KWD 210
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.12 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.77
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.66
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 5.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.62
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 23.87
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 20.46
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 281.05
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 240.9
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
235 km/h
250
6
8
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4885 mm
5040
1840 mm
1905
1445 mm
1480
2824 mm
3052
427 L
455
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
8.1
60 L
70
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
5.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
298 BHP
370 BHP
356 Nm
536
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
