Camry Grande 2.5L vs Dodge Charger 2023 5.7L R/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
KWD 12103
KWD 15599
KWD 11611
KWD 14995
KWD 163
KWD 210
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.12 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.66
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.62
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 10.23
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 20.46
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 240.9
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
8
/
250
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4920
5040
1840
1905
1445
1480
/
3052
/
455
Fuel Economy
17.2
8.1
60
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
power
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Rear Power
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver, Front Passenger, Side And Curtain.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
✓
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/45R18
/
235/45R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5L
5.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
201
370 BHP
240
536
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
