Land Cruiser GR-S HEV vs X5 40i xDrive M Sport Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Price Comparison
KWD 36702
KWD 41005
KWD 35307
KWD 39423
KWD 494
KWD 552
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.86
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.86
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
/
243 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4922 mm
1990
2004 mm
1945
1745 mm
/
2975 mm
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
10.9
11.4 Km/L
68
83 L
/
11.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Doors
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Driver Seat
/
Premium Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Four
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Front + Knee + Side (1st & 2nd Row) + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
/
Transmission
Front + Central + Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
457 BHP
340 BHP
790
450 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
