LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT

LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

No data found

Negative

No data found

Positive

Spacious and versatile space
High durability and reliability
Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
Fuel economy is lower than expected
Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Price Comparison

KWD 5935

KWD 10029

KWD 5673

KWD 9642

KWD 80

KWD 135

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.07 L/KM

0.11 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

KWD 0.39

Daily Fule Payment

KWD 0.61

Weekly Fule Payment

KWD 2.7

Weekly Fule Payment

KWD 4.24

Monthly Fule Payment

KWD 11.55

Monthly Fule Payment

KWD 18.15

Yearly Fule Payment

KWD 140.53

Yearly Fule Payment

KWD 220.83

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Van Van

Engine / Motor

Dimensions

1240

2155

4045

5265

1665

1950

1930

1990

2650

3210

2000

3200

4.9m

5.5m

2075 - 1495 - 1305

2530 - 1760 - 1340

3.4m³

6.2m³

760

1045

Fuel Economy

14.1 Km/L

9.1 Km/L

Comfort

✓

Interior

Driver Seat

✓

4.2

✓

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

✓

Infotainment

✓

Transmission

4-Speed Automatic Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Macpherson

Macpherson Strut

Coil Spring

Leaf spring rigid

Wheels/brakes

✓

Drum

165R14C

215/70R16C

165R14C

215/70R16C

Exterior

✓

Engine

1.5

3.5

Gasoline

96.5

277

134

351