Tucson 2025 Comfort 1.6L vs Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 7649
KWD 10400
KWD 7341
KWD 9999
KWD 103
KWD 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 15.35
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
4
1596 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4500 mm
4549
1865 mm
1860
1650 mm
1689
2680 mm
2734
620 L
/
210 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
14.9
54 L
/
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
177 BHP
216 BHP
264 Nm
325
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
