ZS 1.3T LUX vs Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 6758
KWD 10400
KWD 6487
KWD 9999
KWD 91
KWD 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 10.23
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
210
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4549
1809
1860
1653
1689
2585
2734
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
14.9
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Virtual Cluster
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags Curtain Airbags
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6
/
6AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
160 BHP
216 BHP
120
/
230
325
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
