09 Hyper Pro vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 14413
KWD 20803
KWD 13863
KWD 20015
KWD 194
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.2
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
215
210 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5042
5115 mm
1977
1980 mm
1780
1920 mm
2984
2890 mm
/
5 Doors
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
12.7
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
254 BHP
271 BHP
350
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
