212 Adventure vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 10391
KWD 20803
KWD 9954
KWD 20015
KWD 140
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
2150
/
4705
5115 mm
1895
1980 mm
1936
1920 mm
2860
2890 mm
1598
/
1598
/
235
221 m
40
/
36
/
23.6
/
/
5 Doors
/
1004 L
Fuel Economy
9.1
9.4 Km/L
80
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
248 BHP
271 BHP
410
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
