300 Challenger 2.0T vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 11735
KWD 20803
KWD 11271
KWD 20015
KWD 158
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.5
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
5115 mm
1930 mm
1980 mm
1927 mm
1920 mm
2750 mm
2890 mm
400 L
1004 L
224 m
221 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
75 L
110 L
10 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
271 BHP
387 Nm
385 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
