C5 2025 Comfort vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 6081
KWD 20803
KWD 5805
KWD 20015
KWD 82
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 15.35
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1496 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1381
/
5
5 Doors
4400
5115 mm
1830
1980 mm
1588
1920 mm
2630
2890 mm
360/1075
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
11.2
9.4 Km/L
51
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
4
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
10.25
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
1.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
156 BHP
271 BHP
230
385 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
ECO, Sport
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
