Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
KWD 8545
KWD 13519
KWD 8221
KWD 12995
KWD 115
KWD 182
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195 km/h
210
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4885 mm
5040
1840 mm
1905
1445 mm
1479
2824 mm
3052
493 L
455
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
9.3
60 L
70
14.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
204 BHP
300 BHP
243 Nm
358
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
