Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs Honda CR-V 2024 2.4 EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Price Comparison
KWD 8840
KWD 15008
KWD 8500
KWD 14439
KWD 119
KWD 202
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 15.35
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4949
4550
1930
1820
1790
1680
2810
2620
/
1053
Fuel Economy
10.5
11.0
74
58
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233 BHP
188 BHP
360
222
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓