Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
KWD 8840
KWD 8756
KWD 8500
KWD 8378
KWD 119
KWD 118
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200 km/h
4
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4949
4570 mm
1930
1845 mm
1790
1660 mm
2810
2660 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
10.5
14.9 Km/L
74
55 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233 BHP
203 BHP
360
243 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
