Ciaz 1.5L GLX vs CT5 V 2025 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 4976
KWD 23394
KWD 4780
KWD 22470
KWD 67
KWD 315
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.72
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 5.01
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 9.9
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 21.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 260.98
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
250 km/h
4
6
1462
2998 cc
GCC
American
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4 Doors
4490 mm
4922
1730 mm
2039
1475 mm
1452
2650 mm
2946
480 L
336 L
160 m
102
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
8 Km/L
43 L
64 L
16.7 Km/L
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
√
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
/
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Bucket
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
6
10
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
6
15
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
4-Speed Automatic
10-speed automatic transmission
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
1.5 L
3.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
104 BHP
360 BHP
138 Nm
550 Nm
/
Turbocharge
/
V6 engine
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
