Dodge Charger 2024 3.6L GT vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
KWD 13519
KWD 8545
KWD 12995
KWD 8221
KWD 182
KWD 115
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.55
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
195 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5040
4885 mm
1905
1840 mm
1479
1445 mm
3052
2824 mm
455
493 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.3
14.9 Km/L
70
60 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
300 BHP
204 BHP
358
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
