HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 8613
KWD 20803
KWD 8265
KWD 20015
KWD 116
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
210 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4630
5115 mm
1890
1980 mm
1663
1920 mm
2750
2890 mm
507
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
13.5
9.4 Km/L
65
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
9AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
231
271 BHP
370
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
