HS 2.0T Comfort vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 6903
KWD 20803
KWD 6611
KWD 20015
KWD 93
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.2
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4574 mm
5115 mm
1876 mm
1980 mm
1685 mm
1920 mm
2720 mm
2890 mm
463 L
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
12.2 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
55 L
110 L
12.2 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
231 BHP
271 BHP
360 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
