JAC JS3 Flagship 2025 vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 4829
KWD 20803
KWD 4644
KWD 20015
KWD 65
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
16
/
4345
5115 mm
1765
1980 mm
1640
1920 mm
600
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
2890 mm
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
45
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Synthetic leather
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
9
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
McPherson Independent
/
Torsion Beam Semi-Independent
/
/
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Solid Disc
/
205/55 R16
/
205/55 R16
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
116
271 BHP
150
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
