Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 19237
KWD 11735
KWD 18485
KWD 11271
KWD 259
KWD 158
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.5
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5046
4760 mm
1975
1930 mm
1795
1927 mm
2900
2750 mm
470
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
9.4
10 Km/L
74
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
224 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
387 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
