Taurus Titanium vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
KWD 14634
KWD 13519
KWD 14067
KWD 12995
KWD 197
KWD 182
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
6
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
19
/
5 Doors
/
4972 mm
5040
1875 mm
1905
1498 mm
1479
2930 mm
3052
520 L
455
205 mm
/
Fuel Economy
15.5Km/L
9.3
66 L
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
Driver Seat
8" Digital
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
239 BHP
300 BHP
382 Nm
358
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
Normal, Sport, Eco
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
