Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L Highline vs AITO 9- 5 seater Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 6610
TBD
KWD 6350
TBD
KWD 89
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 12.32
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
✓
22"
4.435
5230
1.695
1999
1.705
1800
2.685
3110
213
/
/
5
Fuel Economy
12.5
/
45
65L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
23
/
16
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Intelligent air suspension
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Electric
/
Galaxy
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5L
Petrol
Hybrid
103 BHP
496 hp
135
675Front:315/Rear:360
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
