Urban Cruiser GL vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
KWD 7126
KWD 4743
KWD 6829
KWD 4511
KWD 96
KWD 64
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.28
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 1.93
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 8.53
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 10.23
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 100.38
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
170
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
17
4365
4323
1795
1809
1645
1653
2600
2585
210
145
/
1318
/
5
/
359/1166
Fuel Economy
19.8
17.2
45 L
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Key
✓
Manual
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
4
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
118 BHP
135
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
