Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 22660
KWD 20803
KWD 21798
KWD 20015
KWD 305
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.77
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 5.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 23.87
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 281.05
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4785 mm
5115 mm
1877 mm
1980 mm
1869 mm
1920 mm
3007 mm
2890 mm
487 L
1004 L
254 m
221 m
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
87 L
110 L
7 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
270 BHP
271 BHP
400 Nm
385 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
