X5 40i xDrive vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 39292
KWD 20803
KWD 37759
KWD 20015
KWD 529
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 15.35
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
243 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4922 mm
5115 mm
2004 mm
1980 mm
1745 mm
1920 mm
2975 mm
2890 mm
645 L
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
11.4 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
83 L
110 L
11.4 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
340 BHP
271 BHP
450 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
