ZS 1.5L LUX vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2023 3.6L Limited Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Price Comparison
KWD 6159
KWD 19759
KWD 5895
KWD 18995
KWD 83
KWD 266
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 9.9
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.5
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
190
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4828
1809
1943
1653
1792
2585
2916
359/1166
782
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
10.0
45
93
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
290 BHP
88
/
180
350
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
