ZS 1.5L STD vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 4743
KWD 6903
KWD 4511
KWD 6611
KWD 64
KWD 93
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 9.9
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.2
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4574 mm
1809
1876 mm
1653
1685 mm
2585
2720 mm
359/1166
463 L
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
12.2 Km/L
45
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
231 BHP
88
/
180
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
