ZS 1.5L STD vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 4743
KWD 135742
KWD 4511
KWD 130608
KWD 64
KWD 1827
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.72
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 5.01
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 10.23
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 22.17
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 260.98
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4385
1809
1875
1653
1850
2585
2560
359/1166
500
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
7.7
45
69
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
184 BHP
88
/
180
303
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
