ZS 1.5L STD vs Tiggo 9 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 4743
KWD 10992
KWD 4511
KWD 10560
KWD 64
KWD 148
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 9.9
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
1318
/
17
16英寸
5
/
4323
4820
1809
1930
1653
1699
2585
2820
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
45
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
10
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
15.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
245/50 R20
215/55 R17
245/50 R20
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
254
88
192
180
390
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
