300 Challenger 2.0T vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
KWD 11735
KWD 8756
KWD 11271
KWD 8378
KWD 158
KWD 118
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
4570 mm
1930 mm
1845 mm
1927 mm
1660 mm
2750 mm
2660 mm
400 L
/
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
75 L
55 L
10 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
None
4
4
224 BHP
203 BHP
387 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
