Atto 3 Comfort vs Sportage Smartstream 2.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Price Comparison
KWD 9507
KWD 8467
KWD 9134
KWD 8134
KWD 128
KWD 114
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.2
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
220 km/h
Chinese
GCC
/
4
/
1998 cc
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215/60R17
/
5 Doors
4 Doors
4455
4515 mm
1875
865 mm
1615
1650 mm
2720
2680 mm
310
591 L
205 mm
/
Fuel Economy
/
12 Km/L
/
54 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
5
/
Front Row Seats
✓
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Single
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
Battery/Charging
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Multi-Link
/
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
201 BHP
152 BHP
310 Nm
192 Nm
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
4
Motor
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
