Ciaz 1.5L GL vs Shine E2 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 4532
KWD 5044
KWD 4360
KWD 4820
KWD 61
KWD 68
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 10.23
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
1462 cc
1496 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4 Doors
4490 mm
4670 mm
1730 mm
1812 mm
1475 mm
1490 mm
2650 mm
2680 mm
480 L
454 L
160 m
150 mm
/
17
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
14
43 L
50 L
16.7 Km/L
14 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
7
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
2
Infotainment
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
Android LCD
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Wheels/brakes
/
205/55 R17
/
205/55 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
103 BHP
123 BHP
138 Nm
158 Nm
/
None
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
ECO/ SPORT
