CR-V TOURING vs Infiniti QX50 2024 2.0T Luxe (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 15591
KWD 15590
KWD 14953
KWD 14950
KWD 210
KWD 210
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.64
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
1498cc
/
/
230
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
1783
/
18 英寸
/
/
/
4706
4693
1866
1903
1681
1679
2700
2800
150
895
198
/
Fuel Economy
57
60
/
12.2
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
/
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
/
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
235/60R18
/
235/60R18
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
/
4
/
10.3:1
/
DOHC DUAL VTC + Exhaust-VTEC
/
190
268 BHP
140.7
/
6000
/
243
380
1700-5000
/
VTEC
/
直喷
/
Euro 5
/
Technologies
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
