Cybertruck AWD vs Land Cruiser 3.5T GR-Sport Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 35726
KWD 35959
KWD 34329
KWD 34592
KWD 481
KWD 484
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
210 km/h
GCC
GCC
/
6
/
3490 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
20
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
5682
4995 mm
2413
1990 mm
1790
1925 mm
3635 mm
2850 mm
3,423.5 L
1004 L
406 mm
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.3 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Manual
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
15
12
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Double Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
600 BHP
409 BHP
521 Nm
650 Nm
/
V
/
3.5 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
10
/
Lithium-Ion
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
