Emgrand 2025 GS vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
KWD 5568
KWD 13519
KWD 5336
KWD 12995
KWD 75
KWD 182
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.2
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
210
4
6
1496 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
16
/
4 Doors
/
4638 mm
5040
1822 mm
1905
1460 mm
1479
2650 mm
3052
500 L
455
151 mm
/
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
9.3
50 L
70
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
121
300 BHP
152 Nm
358
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
