Expedition Active 4X2 2025 vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Price Comparison
KWD 19238
KWD 20727
KWD 18489
KWD 19934
KWD 259
KWD 279
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
191 km/h
6
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5636
4583 mm
2029
2008 mm
1941
1969 mm
3343
2587 mm
592
397 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
10.3
10 Km/L
107
88 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
400
300 BHP
650
400 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
