Explorer 2025 Active 200A vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious, comfortable, family-friendly interior
- Powerful engine options including V6 engine
- Advanced and easy-to-use technical and security systems
Negative
- High fuel consumption in some models
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- Limited comfort of the third grade for adults
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 13590
KWD 11735
KWD 13046
KWD 11271
KWD 183
KWD 158
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.64
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
200 km/h
4
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5049
4760 mm
2004
1930 mm
1775
1927 mm
3025
2750 mm
515
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
12.7
10 Km/L
67
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.2
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
10 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
255/65 R18
/
255/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.3L EcoBoost L4
/
300 BHP
224 BHP
420
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
