Groove 1.5L LT vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Good and convenient internal space distribution
Negative
- The engine performance is mediocre, especially when accelerating
- The quality of interior details needs improvement
- Insufficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 6162
KWD 20803
KWD 5907
KWD 20015
KWD 83
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 9.9
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4500 mm
5115 mm
/
5 Doors
/
1980 mm
/
1920 mm
/
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
16.1 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
16.1 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
271 BHP
147 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
