Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Toyota Hiace 2018 2.5L Commuter M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
KWD 10029
KWD 8460
KWD 9642
KWD 8100
KWD 135
KWD 114
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.54
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.78
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.74
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 197.1
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
6
4
Dimensions
3
8 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
4715
1950
1800
1990
1985
3210
2985
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
11.4
70
75
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Diesel
277
88 BHP
351
192
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
