Cerato 1.6L LX vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
KWD 6909
KWD 8545
KWD 6645
KWD 8221
KWD 93
KWD 115
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.55
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.55
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
195 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4640
4885 mm
1800
1840 mm
1440
1445 mm
2700
2824 mm
427
493 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.9
14.9 Km/L
53
60 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
204 BHP
154
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
