L6 2025 Pro vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Price Comparison
KWD 16119
KWD 20727
KWD 15493
KWD 19934
KWD 217
KWD 279
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
191 km/h
4
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
2330
/
20
/
5
5 Doors
4925
4583 mm
1960
2008 mm
1735
1969 mm
2920
2587 mm
1696
/
1704
/
180 mm
/
/
397 L
Fuel Economy
14.4
10 Km/L
60
88 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Electric
/
Interior
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
4.82
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
OLED
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Nappa Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.7
/
15.7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
/
Transmission
1
/
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Double wishbone front suspension
/
Five-link rear suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
255/50 R20
/
255/50 R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
408 BHP
300 BHP
330
/
620
400 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
Motor
529
/
2
/
3.5 kW
/
PMSM
/
300
/
408
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comfort, Normal, Sport, Performance
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
L2
/
