Land Cruiser GXR1 vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 22061
KWD 11735
KWD 21205
KWD 11271
KWD 297
KWD 158
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4760 mm
1980
1930 mm
1905
1927 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
10.1
10 Km/L
110
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Hi Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
Central And Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
409
224 BHP
650
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
