Land Cruiser GXR1 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2023 2.0T SE (200 PS) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 22061
KWD 15672
KWD 21205
KWD 15060
KWD 297
KWD 211
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.64
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
216
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4395
1980
1984
1905
1649
/
2681
/
577
Fuel Economy
10.1
12.5
110
68.5
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Front Doors
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Hi Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Central And Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
409
200 BHP
650
320
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
